The False Dichotomy between “Rape Victim” and “Rape Survivor”

Location

Ponderosa Room C

Presentation Type

Presentation

Presentation Topic

Rape, Trauma, Identity, Victim vs Survivor, strength vs weakness, pop feminism, pop psychology

Start Date

6-3-2026 11:15 AM

Event Sort Order

28

Abstract

It is my belief that the identity terms "victim vs survivor", in the specific cases of sexual assault and abuse, is a false dichotomy. In recent pop feminism, I have observed a general shift away from the term 'victim' to reclaim a person's autonomy and not let the sexual violence they have faced define them. I want to argue that this, while understandable, is unhelpful because it removes the tragedy that sexual violence is systemic rather than the actions of an individual agent. To give a more precise example, I am a victim of the patriarchal and cultural misogyny that allowed my sexual abuse to happen and continue, and I am a survivor of the pain my abuser inflicted upon me. I am still victimized by the patriarchal system. For me, the term “survived” means to have healed and moved on, so I'm not always comfortable using it to define myself because I am still impacted by the trauma and continuously deal with the misogyny that protected my abuser.

I believe that the larger feminist movement must shift away from seeing 'victim' as something inherently wrong because of the weakness and vulnerability that comes with being a victim of a violent act; that sexual violence is a tool of patriarchal enforcement and is accepted on the wider social patriarchal scale, and that we can all be victims of it at any time.

Presenter Bio

Yassmin Abdul-Malik is a senior from Webster University. She is a double major in Illustration and Philosophy and aims to hopefully teach people, whether through museum curation or becoming a professor, how art connects people across language, time, and borders. A fun fact about her is that her fastest time in Expert Sudoku mode is 5 minutes.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Mar 6th, 11:15 AM Mar 6th, 12:05 PM

The False Dichotomy between “Rape Victim” and “Rape Survivor”

Ponderosa Room C

It is my belief that the identity terms "victim vs survivor", in the specific cases of sexual assault and abuse, is a false dichotomy. In recent pop feminism, I have observed a general shift away from the term 'victim' to reclaim a person's autonomy and not let the sexual violence they have faced define them. I want to argue that this, while understandable, is unhelpful because it removes the tragedy that sexual violence is systemic rather than the actions of an individual agent. To give a more precise example, I am a victim of the patriarchal and cultural misogyny that allowed my sexual abuse to happen and continue, and I am a survivor of the pain my abuser inflicted upon me. I am still victimized by the patriarchal system. For me, the term “survived” means to have healed and moved on, so I'm not always comfortable using it to define myself because I am still impacted by the trauma and continuously deal with the misogyny that protected my abuser.

I believe that the larger feminist movement must shift away from seeing 'victim' as something inherently wrong because of the weakness and vulnerability that comes with being a victim of a violent act; that sexual violence is a tool of patriarchal enforcement and is accepted on the wider social patriarchal scale, and that we can all be victims of it at any time.